The evidence of defendant's guilt was so overwhelming, independent of the stolen property recovered from defendant's bag, that we find it unnecessary to determine whether the hearing court correctly found that defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of the bag. Any error in the court's ruling was harmless (see People v Crimmins,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.