Contrary to the defendant's contention in his pro se supplemental brief, the Supreme Court did not err in declining to suppress identification evidence on the basis that the photo arrays and lineup procedures which resulted in the complainants' identification of the defendant as the perpetrator were unduly suggestive. There is no requirement that the other participants in a lineup...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.