MIAMI CAPITAL, LLC v. HURWITZ

9793. 150310/16.

174 A.D.3d 414 (2019)

101 N.Y.S.3d 598

2019 NY Slip Op 05332

Miami Capital, LLC, Appellant, v. Seymour Hurwitz, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided July 2, 2019.


Defendant's motion was properly granted because while plaintiff anticipates that it could be subject to a rescission claim at some point in the future, such alleged damages are purely speculative and not yet ripe. Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed "to make the injured client whole" (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 N.Y.2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff's complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases