The court properly admitted testimony referring to defendant as a person speaking in wiretapped conversations. There was circumstantial evidence that strongly connected defendant to at least one of three intercepted phones (see People v Lynes,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.