1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 169 A.D.3d
  5. 169 A.D.3d 622 (2019)
 

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. SEEMA

8561N. 381702/08.

169 A.D.3d 622 (2019)

92 N.Y.S.3d 888

2019 NY Slip Op 01504

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Respondent, v. Maharaj Seema, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 28, 2019.

Only an "aggrieved" party, meaning one who has a "direct interest in the controversy which is affected by the result," may appeal from a judgment or order (State of New York v Philip Morris Inc., 61 A.D.3d 575, 578 [1st Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks omitted], appeal dismissed 15 N.Y.3d 898, 900 [2010]; CPLR 5511). Here, defendant Maharaj lacks a direct interest in the controversy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases