1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 169 A.D.3d
  5. 169 A.D.3d 407 (2019)
 

MATTER OF SINOPIDIS v. PORT AUTH. OF N.Y. & N.J.

8315. 152427/17.

169 A.D.3d 407 (2019)

92 N.Y.S.3d 42

2019 NY Slip Op 00830

In the George Sinopidis, Appellant, v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 5, 2019.

Petitioner failed to demonstrate that respondent lacked the discretion to formulate and implement the promotional procedures used here, and failed to show that on their face the procedures were unlawful or arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Ruskin v Ward, 167 A.D.2d 161 [1st Dept 1990]). Nor has petitioner raised an issue as to whether the failing grade he received based on his performance at a Qualifications Review Meeting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases