The petition was facially sufficient to establish the value of three phones stolen from a store. The supporting deposition of the store's operations manager provided the requisite "plain and concise factual statement" (Family Ct Act § 311.1 [3] [h]), because it stated the specific total value of the phones.
Appellant did not preserve his claim that the evidence at the fact-finding hearing was legally insufficient to establish the value of the phones, and we decline...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.