Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's explanation for striking a prospective juror was a pretext for intentional discrimination is unpreserved for appellate review because "[t]he defendant did not object to the [Supreme] Court's acceptance of the prosecutor's [facially race-neutral] explanation, and did not articulate any reason why he believed that the explanation was pretextual" (People v Rubin,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.