Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
There is no dispute that the claimant failed to timely serve his claim upon the Attorney General as required by Court of Claims Act § 10 (3) and that his cross motion for leave to serve a late claim upon the Attorney General was not made within the three-year statute of limitations as required by Court of Claims Act § 10 (6).
The timeliness of the service and filing requirements of Court of Claims Act...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.