The court properly permitted two of defendant's accomplices to give testimony regarding the fraudulent securities scheme in which they participated, and they did not provide expert testimony. When these witnesses interpreted documents involved in the scheme and explained certain terms, they were employing their personal knowledge of the particular scheme rather than general expertise, and they used the records to provide specific examples of the conduct they described. Given...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.