We find that plaintiff's claims are preempted by federal law, pursuant to Labor Management Relations Act § 301 (29 USC § 185), as they require interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement.
Plaintiff's breach of contract claim is premised on his assertions that the parties agreed, as part of his employment contract, that he would be covered by AT&T's collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with a local union, with protections including that plaintiff...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.