Per Curiam.
We find that respondent's misconduct in New Jersey would constitute misconduct in this state in violation of Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) rule 8.4 (d), which is directly analogous to the rule violation underlying his New Jersey discipline (see generally Matter of Keegan,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.