Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Court of Claims providently exercised its discretion in denying the claimant's motion to file a late claim. We agree with the court's determination, upon weighing the statutory factors set forth in Court of Claims Act § 10 (6), that the claimant failed to establish that his delay was excusable (see Olsen v State of New York,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.