Petitioner failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed acts warranting an order of protection in her favor, particularly in light of the court's finding that none of the testimony was credible (see Family Ct Act § 832; Matter of Everett C. v Oneida P.,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.