Defendant demonstrated that it is not obligated to proceed with a proposed loan to plaintiff at an interest rate of 4.375%. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the loan documents are complete, clear and unambiguous, and therefore must be enforced in accordance with their plain meaning (see Riverside S. Planning Corp. v CRP/Extell Riverside, L.P.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MACKENZIE v. EMIGRANT MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.
7106. 310625/10.
164 A.D.3d 1159 (2018)
84 N.Y.S.3d 120
2018 NY Slip Op 06200
Lionel F. Mackenzie, Appellant, v. Emigrant Mortgage Company, Inc., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 25, 2018.
Decided September 25, 2018.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.