Contrary to the defendant's contention, the telephone conversation that the defendant had with his wife while he was incarcerated was properly admitted into evidence. Since, at the start of each conversation, the defendant was advised that the call he was placing might be recorded or monitored, he may not avail himself of the protection of the marital privilege (see CPLR 4502...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.