Substantial evidence supports respondent's finding that on April 19, 2016 petitioner allowed the premises to become disorderly in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 (6), and failed to exercise adequate supervision in violation of Rules of State Liquor Authority (9 NYCRR) § 48.2. Specifically, there is substantial evidence that the security guards on duty exercised lax supervision, which was tolerated by management to the extent that an assault occurred...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.