Defendants established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence showing that Dr. Aizer did not depart from good and accepted medical practice in the performance of two cardiac ablation procedures on plaintiff Kelly Cabral. Plaintiffs' opposition, including the opinions of experts, raised triable issues of fact as to whether Kelly's preexisting condition of Factor V Leiden required a smaller catheter than was used during the procedure, whether post...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.