After a sufficient inquiry, the suppression court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request for new counsel, made as the hearing was about to begin. Contrary to defendant's assertion, the court did not merely conduct a perfunctory inquiry, but instead allowed defendant to voice his concerns about counsel. Furthermore, while the court advised defendant that he had not made any specific allegations, defendant still provided nothing but vague and generic...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
