A preponderance of the evidence supports the Family Court's finding that respondent knew or should have known that the mother was drinking to the point of intoxication while she was caring for the children (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). Respondent testified that he would see the mother at least three times a week during the same time period the Family Court determined that she was drinking to the point of intoxication almost every day and his testimony made...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.