The will bequeaths decedent's entire estate to nonparty Radio Drama Network, Inc. Thus, the only way objectant can argue that Richard L. Kay (the proponent of the will) tricked decedent is by challenging the October 20, 2004 restatement of the Himan Brown Revocable Trust. However, as the Surrogate noted, objectant lacks standing to contest the 2004 restatement because he had no beneficial interest in any prior version of the trust (see Matter of Ramm v Allen,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF BROWN
2304, 2056/10.
144 A.D.3d 587 (2016)
2016 NY Slip Op 07993
42 N.Y.S.3d 23
In the Matter of HIMAN BROWN, Deceased. BARRY BROWN, Appellant; RICHARD L. KAY, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 29, 2016.
Decided November 29, 2016.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
