There is no support in the record for defendants' contention that plaintiff's conduct was "undertaken primarily to delay or prolong the resolution of the litigation" (22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [2]; compare Pickens v Castro,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CURTIS v. TABAK IS TRIBECA, LLC
2218N, 102071/15.
144 A.D.3d 509 (2016)
2016 NY Slip Op 07612
41 N.Y.S.3d 41
W. ROBERT CURTIS, ESQ., Respondent, v. TABAK IS TRIBECA, LLC, et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 15, 2016.
Decided November 15, 2016.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.