LAPSLEY-COCKETT v. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY

653394/2012.

143 A.D.3d 558 (2016)

2016 NY Slip Op 06861

38 N.Y.S.3d 896

TANYA LAPSLEY-COCKETT et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant, and NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 20, 2016.


The court found credible evidence to show that the notice of claim was served, albeit by regular mail, on the Transit Authority within 90 days after the claim arose, and that the Transit Authority requested a 50-h hearing (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [3] [c] ["If the notice is served within the period specified by this section, but in a manner not in compliance with the provisions of this subdivision, the service shall be valid if the public corporation against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases