JONES v. SETA

1848N, 308688/11.

143 A.D.3d 482 (2016)

2016 NY Slip Op 06556

38 N.Y.S.3d 422

TYSON JONES et al., Respondents, v. RICHARD V. SETA et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 6, 2016.


Defendants' discovery, after the filing of the note of issue, that Jones had been involved in prior accidents involving the same body parts alleged to have been injured in the subject accident, constitutes "unusual or unanticipated circumstances" warranting further discovery (22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; see Bermel v Dagostino, 50 A.D.3d 303 [1st Dept 2008]). However, defendants have not articulated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases