1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 142 A.D.3d
  5. 142 A.D.3d 863 (2016)
 

RUDERMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK

1699, 651466/13.

142 A.D.3d 863 (2016)

37 N.Y.S.3d 543

IRVING RUDERMAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided September 27, 2016.

Although the order did not expressly address plaintiff's retaliation claim, it unambiguously granted defendants' motion to dismiss in its entirety. CPLR 2219 (a) provides the court with "broad leeway" as to the form of the order, and the parties addressed this claim in their motion papers (Corteguera v City of New York, 179 A.D.2d 362, 363 [1st Dept 1992]).

Plaintiff's retaliation claim under federal and state civil rights...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases