A preponderance of the evidence supports Family Court's determination that respondent, the biological father of two of the subject children and a person legally responsible for the other subject children, sexually abused the oldest subject child, then 12 years old, in violation of Penal Law §§ 130.52 (1), 130.55 and 130.60 (2) (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [e] [iii]; 1046 [b] [i]). The child's out-of-court statements were corroborated by respondent...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.