The detailed election procedures contained in defendant's ordinances defeat plaintiff's claims that, pursuant to defendant's charter, wardens or vestrymen must be elected by a "majority of votes" and that defendant must allow and count "no" votes or votes against nominees.
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.