Defendant, who did not appear in this action to annul the parties' marriage, concedes that he was served with the summons and notice, and did not object to the annulment. He contends, however, that a statement in the summons that "[t]he parties have divided up the marital property, and no claim will be made by either party under equitable distribution," is false. He also argued to the motion court that he did not understand the consequences of the statement, and did not realize...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.