Although Phoenix sought leave to renew and reargue the parties' prior motions for summary judgment in its action against 70th Street, the motion was actually a motion for leave to reargue, since it did not proffer any "new facts" in support of the motion (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; see Prime Income Asset Mgt., Inc. v American Real Estate Holdings L.P.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
70TH STREET APTS. CORP. v. PHOENIX CONSTR., INC.
161709/14, 1296, 103223/09.
139 A.D.3d 619 (2016)
30 N.Y.S.3d 857
2016 NY Slip Op 04127
70TH STREET APARTMENTS CORP., Respondent, v. PHOENIX CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant. PHOENIX CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant, v. 70TH STREET APARTMENTS CORP., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 31, 2016.
Decided May 31, 2016.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.