Plaintiff alleged that she was struck on the head by a piece of ice that fell from a building owned and managed by defendants. At her deposition, however, she testified that she did not know the nature of the object that struck her in the head, and did not know its provenance. Accordingly, her claim that the object was both a piece of ice and that it came from defendants' premises was entirely speculative, justifying dismissal of her claim (see e.g. Harrison v New York...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.