The motion court correctly determined that a damages inquest was required. However, the motion court should have held a hearing on plaintiffs' application for an attachment under CPLR 6201 (3). Plaintiffs are correct that Pursuit's ex post facto qualification to do business in the state did not per se defeat its motion for an attachment under CPLR 6201 (1) (see Elton Leather Corp. v First Gen. Resources Co.,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.