The court providently exercised its discretion in precluding cross-examination of the victim regarding an allegation of sexual abuse he made against another person. The other complaint did not have a significant probative relation to the charges against appellant, and there was no factual showing of any likelihood that the allegations in the prior complaint were false (see People v Mandel,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.