Defendants made a prima facie showing that plaintiff did not sustain a permanent consequential or signification limitation of use of her lumbar spine as a result of the accident at issue, by submitting the affirmed report of a neurologist who found full range of motion and normal function of the spine, as well as the report of a radiologist who attributed plaintiff's disc herniations to a chronic, preexisting condition (see Alvarez v NYLL Mgt. Ltd.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ROLDAN v. CONTI
453, 300511/12.
137 A.D.3d 507 (2016)
26 N.Y.S.3d 472
2016 NY Slip Op 01620
ROSANGELY ROLDAN, Appellant, v. VICTOR CONTI et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 8, 2016.
Decided March 8, 2016.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
