1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 26 N.Y.3d
  5. 26 N.Y.3d 1152 (2016)
 

MATTER OF TUNG v. CHINA BUDDHIST ASSN.

No. 73 SSM 2

26 N.Y.3d 1152 (2016)

48 N.E.3d 497

28 N.Y.S.3d 355

2016 NY Slip Op 01210

In the Matter of MING TUNG et al., Appellants, v. CHINA BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided February 18, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander Palmer Kelly, New York City, for appellants.

Capell Barnett Matalon & Schoenfeld LLP, New York City (Joseph Milano of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Judith J. Gische at the Appellate Division, First Department (124 A.D.3d 13 [2014]), and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary.

Concur: Chief Judge DIFIORE and Judges PIGOTT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases