Defendant established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury resulting in either a "permanent consequential" or a "significant" limitation of use of his lumbar spine by submitting an affirmation by a neurologist who examined plaintiff and found a full range of motion of the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MELO v. GRULLON
8753, 309086/09.
101 A.D.3d 452 (2012)
955 N.Y.S.2d 581
2012 NY Slip Op 8432
PEDRO MELO, Appellant, v. JOSE GRULLON, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 6, 2012.
December 6, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.