MELO v. GRULLON

8753, 309086/09.

101 A.D.3d 452 (2012)

955 N.Y.S.2d 581

2012 NY Slip Op 8432

PEDRO MELO, Appellant, v. JOSE GRULLON, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 6, 2012.


Defendant established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury resulting in either a "permanent consequential" or a "significant" limitation of use of his lumbar spine by submitting an affirmation by a neurologist who examined plaintiff and found a full range of motion of the lumbar spine, and diagnosed him with a resolved lumbar sprain/ strain (see Baez v Boyd, 90 A.D.3d 524

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases