Plaintiff's notice of claim, filed on June 11, 2009, contained an accident date of March 18, 2009. He then moved to change the date of the accident from March 18, 2009 to March 9, 2009. Plaintiff essentially sought an order deeming the notice of claim timely served nunc pro tunc. Given the accident date of March 9, 2008, plaintiff's service of the notice of claim, however, was untimely by three days (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [1]
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BOBKO v. CITY OF NEW YORK
8461, 105908/10, 8462.
100 A.D.3d 439 (2012)
953 N.Y.S.2d 214
JAMES BOBKO, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 8, 2012.
November 8, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
