1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.3d
  4. 36 Misc.3d
  5. 36 Misc.3d 67 (2012)
 

AGOVINO & ASSELTA v. RUBENS

Not in source.

36 Misc.3d 67 (2012)

950 N.Y.S.2d 622

2012 NY Slip Op 22118

AGOVINO & ASSELTA, LLP, Respondent, v. RICHARD RUBENS, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, 9th and 10th Judicial Districts.

Decided April 25, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Rubens, appellant pro se.

Agovino & Asselta, LLP, Mineola ( John M. Comiskey of counsel), for respondent.

IANNACCI, J.P., NICOLAI and MOLIA, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Pursuant to Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 137, Richard Rubens sought an arbitration of his fee dispute with the law firm of Agovino & Asselta, LLP (Agovino & Asselta). Following a hearing, the panel of arbitrators rendered an award in favor of Agovino & Asselta in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases