In the Matter of L&M BUS CORP. et al., Respondents-Appellants,
v.
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al., Appellants-Respondents, and
LOCAL 1181 OF THE AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, Intervenor-Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 22, 2009.
Decided December 22, 2009.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Dona B. Morris, Francis F. Caputo, Andrew Gelfand, Michael Adler, and Eric P. Jewell, of counsel), for appellants-respondents.
Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C., New York City (Richard A. Brook, Richard N. Gilberg, Robert Marinovic, and Melissa S. Woods, of counsel), for appellant.
Wasserman Grubin & Rogers, LLP, New York City (John F. Grubin, and James Joyce, of counsel), for respondents-appellants.
GONZALEZ, P.J., ANDRIAS and SAXE, JJ., concur.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
OPINION OF THE COURT
TOM, J.
At issue on this appeal is the propriety of a request for bids (RFB) issued by respondent New York City Department of Education (DOE). The RFB invites bids for providing transportation between home and school to handicapped children participating in pre-K and early intervention (EI) programs.* Bids are required to be submitted "on a per rider per day basis...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.