1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 67 A.D.3d
  5. 67 A.D.3d 769 (2009)
 

RUSSO v. STOMA

2008-07004.

67 A.D.3d 769 (2009)

887 N.Y.S.2d 865

2009 NY Slip Op 08206

ROSEMARY RUSSO, Respondent, v. HENRY STOMA et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 10, 2009.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the plaintiff presented adequate evidence to specifically identify the subject garden area for the purpose of finding that she acquired title thereto by adverse possession (see Sievernich v Sidorowicz, 281 A.D.2d 616 [2001]). Moreover, the plaintiff's submissions satisfied the usual cultivation or improvement requirements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases