The determination that respondent neglected Nyasia and derivatively neglected the three other children was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; § 1046 [b] [i]) showing that, although respondent should have known that Nyasia was in danger of being sexually abused by respondent's live-in boyfriend, respondent permitted the boyfriend to remain in the family home unsupervised (see Matter of Alexis C.,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.