1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 66 A.D.3d
  5. 66 A.D.3d 549 (2009)
 

RUFFIN v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A.

865, 101855/06.

66 A.D.3d 549 (2009)

886 N.Y.S.2d 338

2009 NY Slip Op 7477

GWENDOLYN RUFFIN, Respondent, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 20, 2009.

Defendants' argument that they are entitled to summary judgment on the basis of plaintiff's deposition testimony that she does not know what caused her to fall places undue reliance on an isolated portion of plaintiff's testimony (see Shechter v City of New York, 17 A.D.3d 124, 124-125 [2005]; Garcia v New York City Tr. Auth., 269 A.D.2d 142, 142-143 [2000]). Although plaintiff at her deposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases