Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant's contention that he was improperly assessed 25 points on the risk assessment instrument for a history of substance abuse and a failure to accept responsibility need not be addressed since there was a sufficient basis to designate him a level three sex offender based upon the 115 points assessed for factors he does not contest (see People v Murphy,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.