1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 65 A.D.3d
  5. 65 A.D.3d 1138 (2009)
 

VASSELL v. MAGNO

65 A.D.3d 1138 (2009)

885 N.Y.S.2d 204

WAYNE VASSELL, Respondent, v. ANGELO MAGNO et al., Defendants, and CHANDRA CHILAPPA et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided September 15, 2009.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to CPLR 503 (a), the venue of an action is properly placed in the county in which any of the parties resided at the time of commencement (see Panco Dev. Corp. v Platek, 262 A.D.2d 292 [1999]). In this case, the plaintiff properly placed venue in Kings County, as that was the county where he resided at the time this litigation was commenced. A few years after the commencement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases