1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 67 A.D.3d
  5. 67 A.D.3d 140 (2009)
 

VIG v. NEW YORK HAIRSPRAY CO.

114613/07, 753754754A

67 A.D.3d 140 (2009)

885 N.Y.S.2d 74

JOEL VIG, Appellant, v. THE NEW YORK HAIRSPRAY CO., L.P., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided September 15, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spizz & Cooper, LLP, Mineola (Harvey W. Spizz of counsel), for appellant.

Proskauer Rose LLP, New York City (Neil H. Abramson and Ian C. Schaefer of counsel), for respondent.

SAXE, J.P., BUCKLEY, McGUIRE and MOSKOWITZ, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

ACOSTA, J.

This case requires us to evaluate the sufficiency of a complaint alleging disability discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law art 15) and the New York City Human Rights Law (City HRL) (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-101 et seq.) in the context of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action.

Background1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases