ZIMET v. BUFANO

2008-07333.

2009 NY Slip Op 06425

GARY J. ZIMET, respondent, v. ROSEMARY BUFANO, appellant, ET AL., defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided September 8, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert V. Magrino, New City, N.Y. (Jennifer Feerick of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel E. Bertolino, P.C., Upper Nyack, N.Y. (Laurie A. Dorsainvil of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Reinaldo E. Rivera, J.P., Mark C. Dillon, Joseph Covello, Randall T. Eng, L. Priscilla Hall, JJ.


DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion to vacate the judgment is granted.

In order to prevail on a motion to vacate a judgment entered upon default, a defendant is required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense (see Fekete v Camp Skwere, 16 A.D.3d 544, 545; Amato v Fast Repair, Inc.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases