Defendant's current claim that the inmate history record introduced by the People was not admissible as a business record because it contained inadmissible hearsay was not preserved because defense counsel did not raise this specific objection at the time the document was proffered, but rather made generalized objections to the admission of the document (see People v Piper,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BILLIP
65 A.D.3d 430 (2009)
883 N.Y.S.2d 528
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALKIM BILLIP, Also Known as ALKIM BILLIPS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided August 4, 2009.
Decided August 4, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.