1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 12 N.Y.3d
  5. 12 N.Y.3d 901 (2009)
 

MATTER OF ANDERSON v. TOWN OF CHILI PLANNING BOARD

12 N.Y.3d 901 (2009)

In the Matter of THOMAS ANDERSON et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF CHILI PLANNING BOARD et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided June 30, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (Janet D. Callahan of counsel), for appellants.

Keith E. O'Toole, Spencerport, for Town of Chili Planning Board, respondent.

Ward Norris Heller & Reidy LLP, Rochester (Jeffrey J. Harridine of counsel), for Metalico Rochester, Inc., respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, respondent Planning Board's determinations issuing a conditional use permit and a negative declaration annulled and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, with directions to remand to the Planning Board for further proceedings for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases