In this matrimonial action, the contractual provision in the retainer agreement that purports to authorize counsel to withdraw upon nonpayment of fees does not vitiate the procedural requirements of CPLR 321 (b), nor does it deprive the court of its traditional discretion in regulating the legal profession by overseeing the charging of fees for legal services (see e.g. Solow Mgt. Corp. v Tanger,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.