Although we decline to disturb the proposed resentence under the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2005, ch 643, § 1), which reduces the original sentence to 7½ years, we find the original sentence excessive to the extent that it directed the sentences to run consecutively. Because of the procedural posture of this case, the rule that resentencing under the Drug Law Reform Act does not permit the issue of concurrent versus consecutive sentencing to be revisited (see People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.