In reaching its verdict that defendant James was not negligent, the jury could fairly have concluded that James could not have foreseen that an object hidden from view would fall and cause plaintiff's injury (see White v New York City Tr. Auth.,
The court's jury charge did not impermissibly narrow the scope of foreseeability but properly "incorporate[d] the factual contentions of the parties in...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.